Forgotten

In a Middle East overwhelmed by war, politics, destruction, and conflict, it is easy to forget that it is, like any other, just a place where life goes on; people live, people grow, people die. Communities flourish and decline. People come and people go. Mired in the hellfire of media and politics, it is easy to overlook the simple truths about life in the Middle East.

New discriminatory law: Marriage and Family Reunification

According to The Daily Star:

Israel’s Supreme Court upheld a law preventing Palestinians married to Israeli Arabs from obtaining Israeli citizenship, a judicial official said on Wednesday. … In their ruling, the judges emphasised that they “recognise the right to family reunification, which respects human rights” but added that “this right must be limited to Israel.”

A Palestinian who is not a citizen of Israel, who is married to a Palestinian who is a citizen of Israel, will not be eligible for Israeli citizenship. It is not a far stretch, then, to assume that any non-Jewish spouses of non-Jewish Israelis (or perhaps even non-Jewish spouses of Jewish Israelis) will be denied Israeli citizenship. It is unsurprising, given the current trend in Israeli legislation and judicial rulings, that Jewish citizens are given more rights and preferences than non-Jewish citizens.

A tabled bill is back: Israel is the state of the Jews, by the Jews, for the Jews?

A Ha’aretz editorial brought my attention back to a bill a Kadima MK is pushing through Knesset: Basic Law: Israel — the Nation-State of the Jewish People. The bill was originally presented in August, following several years of what seemed to be efforts to strengthen the legally Jewish character of the state, such as the passage of the Nakba Law and the Loyalty Oath debacle, in which non-Jewish citizens would be required to swear allegiance to Israel as a “Jewish and democratic state.”
Continue reading

I beg to differ, Your Honor

Yesterday, Judge Richard Goldstone wrote this op-ed in the New Y

ork Times. Titled “Israel and the Apartheid Slander,” the piece is devoted to defending Israel from the charge that it is an apartheid state.

Part of me thinks that the term “apartheid,” does more harm than good. It alienates people, putting moderates on the defensive. People go crazy when they hear the word in reference to Israel. Often the response is: “anti-semitism!” This debate is about as productive as the one that goes: “You’re a poopy head!”, “No you’re a poopy head!”

But, since you brought it up, your honor, I’ll engage. Continue reading

Israel arrests journalist, deletes his photos, and tells him he can never ever ever show them to anybody. Or. Else.

And another fun one:

Israel Police broke up a demonstration (which apparently didn’t have a permit, whatever) and arrested people (fine, whatever) including a journalist who was taking pictures for his job (probably not okay) and then deleted pictures from his camera (uncool) and told him he could never publicize them or else be held for interrogation (which probably really means this. MEGA uncool).

Of course, all this information follows the quote from one of my least favorite MKs, Danny Danon:

Likud MK Danny Danon demanded that the Attorney General charge the arrested demonstrators soon. “Whoever supports terror is treasonous to the State of Israel, they must be jailed immediately,” said Danon.

This is not the only time this has happened; I think uniformed law enforcement in Israel have a penchant for censorship and violating rights of journalists (and lots of other people, too).

Should OWS be setting demands?

Yesterday’s Guardian ran an article on a growing controversy among the ranks of OWSers. Apparently, a working group in New York has been established to put forth a set of demands.

On Tuesday night they will hold what could be one of the most controversial mass meetings at Zuccotti Park so far when the general assembly discusses whether the movement should officially call for a massive public works programme with government employment, paid for by ending all of America’s overseas military operations.

The substance of the demand is not the subject of the controversy. Rather, it is the principle of adopting a demand, and the process for doing so, that have opened a rift between “purists”, who favour consensus-building, and those now arguing for majority rule on some decisions.

The underlying force of the movement and its ultimate goals (inasmuch as “social revolution” is a goal) come from a collective understanding that radical social upheaval (revolution) is necessary to guarantee long-term sustainability and security. But this is a long process.
Continue reading

Vendettas.

My intention was to head to Boston today to Occupy our fair city of tea parties and revolution, but it is dreary and raining and I know, I know, I am lame and so not hardcore. I’ll embrace my role as an armchair activist.

Until I get off my tuchas (sp?), look what’s lacking at Occupies Maine and Baltimore.

Philadelphia, Mon., Oct. 10, 2011


Continue reading

First impressions: #occupydc

Occupy DC is small, way smaller than New York. But that’s unsurprising. I saw a baton twirler I had seen in New York, though, so that was cool. Small world, I guess.

The scene in New York is a mix of “dirty hippie,” hipster Brooklyn-ite, and nondescript people of all ages, shapes, sizes, and colors.

DC is a little heavier on the “dirty hippie” thing. It doesn’t have the same sardines encampment feel, although the park is bigger and there is more grass. A much more pleasant sleeping arrangement, I can only imagine.
Continue reading

#occupywallstreet has potential.

Can or will OWS achieve something? Yes and no.

On many levels, it already has. It has brought attention to the discontentment of and economic inequality facing thousands, and probably millions, of Americans. It has presented an alternative to the current options: The System and the Tea Party. It has created an outlet in which we can express our anger. It has brought some unity of thought and action to a hugely diverse group of people.
Continue reading

Does #occupywallstreet mean something?

There is some impression from the media that the occupy wall street protestors are disorganized, are messy, are visionless, and are altogether insignificant.

But what kind of grassroots movement would it be if it wasn’t disorganized and messy, if it didn’t seem visionless at times, and how would they gain any credibility and any viable power without seeming insignificant?
Continue reading