Articles & Opinions on the Recent Violence in Palestine

I feel so far removed from the Middle East now, yet at the same time inextricably connected. When I heard the news of the latest viagra online attacks I was overcome with sadness. I feel angry, helpless and as always, unimaginably frustrated by the stupidity

of it all. I don’t have anything constructive to add to the debate right now, but felt the need to spread the word, so I compiled a few good reads&listens and added some ways to help at the bottom. I also received the following quote in an email from Jen Marlowe this morning that I’d like to share:

My colleague and dear friend Sami Al Jundi said best what I want most to say:
“My children will be safe only when your children know safetly, and your children will be safe only when my children know safety.”

But then, Sami corrected himself:
“Actually, there’s no such thing as my children and your children. There’s only our children.”

Here’s the roundup: Continue reading

Just a thought:

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Israeli authorities on Saturday began deporting pro-Palestinian activists who tried to breach the Jewish state’s naval blockade of the Gaza Strip.

What does it mean, actually, to be pro-Palestinian? Is that an accurate description of the activists aboard the flotilla?

What does it mean that the writer switched from “Israel” to “Jewish state”? Can they be used synonymously, or do they carry different connotations?

This is just a teaser: Now, my running commentary as I read the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action.

All over the news (well, my weird, non-comprehensive news radar anyway) today was Israel’s and the US’s boycott of a 10th anniversary commemoration of Durban, the “controversial conference on racism.” To be completely honest, I haven’t read the Program(me) of Action, and other than passing mention of it among the litany of UN resolutions and documents and investigations some people like to whine about, I don’t really know what the heck it’s all about. Forgive my ignorance, please.

So I am going to read the whole thing before I say anything else. BUT in the meantime, I am on page 5, and here is a nice quote which makes me predisposed to think I am going to have little critical to say about the overarching themes of the conference:

(This is General Issue #7): “We declare that all human beings are born free, equal in dignity and rights and have the potential to contribute constructively to the development and well-being of their societies. Any doctrine of racial superiority is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous, and must be rejected along with theories which attempt to determine the existence of separate human races…”

Addendum 1:

This is so #occu-propriate. (How do you like that creative English?)

(General Issue #9): We note with concern that racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance may be aggravated by, inter alia, inequitable distribution of wealth, marginalization and social exclusion;

Addendum 2:

Is this contradictory?

23. We fully recognize the rights of indigenous peoples consistent with the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity of States, and therefore stress the need to adopt the appropriate constitutional, administrative, legislative and judicial measures, including those derived from applicable international instruments;

24. We declare that the use of the term “indigenous peoples” in the Declaration and Programme of Action of the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance is in the context of, and without prejudice to the outcome of, ongoing international negotiations on texts that specifically deal with this issue, and cannot be construed as having any implications as to rights under international law;

(I don’t know why Israel and the US are getting all uppity about this; it’s like they can’t take criticism. The manifestations of racism this document discusses, while it does specify histories of slavery and colonialism as important factors, are present in basically every country in the world. If everyone else wants to move on and grow up, why can’t we? So far, this reads like an expression of the ills and sins of all humanity, like a massive atonement.)

Addendum 3:

Here, the U.S. and the rest of the Western Hemisphere is called out:

33. We consider it essential for all countries in the region of the Americas and all other areas of the African Diaspora to recognize the existence of their population of African descent and the cultural, economic, political and scientific contributions made by that population, and recognize the persistence of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance that specifically affect them, and recognize that, in many countries, their long-standing inequality in terms of access to, inter alia, education, health care and housing has been a profound cause of the socio-economic disparities that affect them;

In Jordan and other parts of the Middle East, Asian women are often employed as maids. It’s not a cushy lifestyle, and I’ve heard many of them got there through being trafficked (also a offense in this doctrine):

36. We recognize that in many parts of the world, Asians and people of Asian descent face barriers as a result of social biases and discrimination prevailing in public and private institutions and express our commitment to work towards the eradication of all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance faced by Asians and people of Asian descent;

This, of course, would pretty much devastate the future possibility of the existence of Israel-as-a-Jewish-State, hence I can understand their trepidation for permitting the global acceptance of these ideals:

42. We emphasize that, in order for indigenous peoples freely to express their own identity and exercise their rights, they should be free from all forms of discrimination, which necessarily entails respect for their human rights and fundamental freedoms. Efforts are now being made to secure universal recognition for those rights in the negotiations on the draft declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples, including the following: to call themselves by their own names; to participate freely and on an equal footing in their country’s political, economic, social and cultural development; to maintain their own forms of organization, lifestyles, cultures and traditions; to maintain and use their own languages; to maintain their own economic structures in the areas where they live; to take part in the development of their educational systems and programmes; to manage their lands and natural resources, including hunting and fishing rights; and to have access to justice on a basis of equality;

43. We also recognize the special relationship that indigenous peoples have with the land as the basis for their spiritual, physical and cultural existence and encourage States, wherever possible, to ensure that indigenous peoples are able to retain ownership of their lands and of those natural resources to which they are entitled under domestic law;

Ooh ooh ooh and here too:

49. … We underline that family reunification has a positive effect on integration and emphasize the need for States to facilitate family reunion;

I also think this isn’t anti-Semitic:

58. We recall that the Holocaust must never be forgotten;

59. We recognize with deep concern religious intolerance against certain religious communities, as well as the emergence of hostile acts and violence against such communities because of their religious beliefs and their racial or ethnic origin in various parts of the world which in particular limit their right to freely practise their belief;

60. We also recognize with deep concern the existence in various parts of the world of religious intolerance against religious communities and their members, in particular limitation of their right to practise their beliefs freely, as well as the emergence of increased negative stereotyping, hostile acts and violence against such communities because of their religious beliefs and their ethnic or so-called racial origin;

61. We recognize with deep concern the increase in anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in various parts of the world, as well as the emergence of racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas against Jewish, Muslim and Arab communities;

BLAM. How can you (Israel and the US) want MORE than this?!?!:

63. We are concerned about the plight of the Palestinian people under foreign occupation. We recognize the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to the establishment of an independent State and we recognize the right to security for all States in the region, including Israel, and call upon all States to support the peace process and bring it to an early conclusion;

Interesting aside, which I think refers to Islamophobia in the West/west:

71. We deplore attempts to oblige women belonging to certain faiths and religious minorities to forego their cultural and religious identity, or to restrict their legitimate expression, or to discriminate against them with regard to opportunities for education and employment;

The beginning of the end? or, how Fayyad and Abbas are pwning Netanyahu.

For years, Palestinian and Israeli “negotiators” have been sitting down for “peace talks,” always with “impartial mediators” alongside. Then, earlier this year, for whatever reason—the Arab Spring, perhaps—the “Palestinians” (I use quotes appropriately because Fatah, let alone Abbas, do not speak for Palestinians as a whole) went to the UN to request recognition of their statehood based on some bizarre notion of feasibility. I am of the opinion they did so knowing it would fail but as a way to take charge in (or overstep) a diplomatic process that has been ****ing them all along. Whether or not they gained anything like, well, a state, they gained some negotiating power back from Goliath. Then, Hamas brokered a deal to release over a thousand of the thousands more Palestinians held in Israeli prisons in exchange for the release of the one and only Israeli (a soldier) imprisoned by Hamas. That’s Palestinians 2 – 0 Israelis. Or it might be 1-0-1.
Continue reading

#occupywallstreet 1

I came to New York this week to visit friends, not unaware that my timing was particularly fortuitous to observe (or join) an #occupywallstreet protest just as the going was getting good.

Generally speaking, it is an action, and a movement, that I can get behind. I think the dependence on corporations, the reliance on corporations, and the power of corporations that we have created in this country out of what I think is fundamentally our own greed and expansionism is despicable. I think these big banks are, in a large part, responsible not just for the real crises we are facing, especially us jobless millenials, but also for the absurd wealth gap in our country, the amount of imaginary money we have been coerced into spending, and the amount of real money we owe.
Continue reading

The Story of Al Araqib and the "Unrecognized" Villages of the Negev

Over the past 13 months I have collected photographs and footage documenting the struggle of the people of Al Araqib and the entire Bedouin community in the Negev/Naqab desert. I hope this brief video helps to explain that struggle.
(Please buy cheap viagra online with prescription excuse

the video quality, I’m working with limited resources. )

Thanks to all who have supported me and to the people of Al Araqib and the Naqab that have been so welcoming. Thanks especially to Hala and Huda for their interviews, Georgina for translation help, and co-blogger Linda for the photo of the uprooted tree at 1:26. All other photos and video are mine.

Quick update: Al Araqib demolished today after weekend of building

Wednesday, July 27th will mark a year since the first mass demolition of Al Araqib. This past weekend, volunteers from around the region and the

world gathered in the village to build shelters, plant olive trees, and spend time with the people of A

l Araqib.

You might

ask: why build homes and plant trees when we know they will be destroyed? The construction was a symbolic gesture meant to show the Israeli government and the world that the villagers will not give up their struggle for their ancestral land. It was meant to show that they are not alone: that people of all nationalities, ethnicities, and religions stand in solidarity with them. It was an act of sumud (صمود‎), or steadfastness.

This morning, after a funeral took place in the village, the bulldozers returned and razed the newly-built shacks and newly-planted olive trees. This was the 28th demolition since last July.

Shacks built by villagers and volunteers on Friday morning

Continue reading